5 Things I never understood about Star Trek

Author: celinus  
Posted: March 28, 2008 | Category: TV, Lists 

star trekScout and I are done with our DVDs of Star Trek: Voyager. It got me thinking, there are some things that have always bothered me, about Voyager and Star Trek in general:

1. Temporal anomalies. I’d like to describe it in my own words but Janeway said it best: “Time travel. Ever since my first day in the job as a Starfleet Captain I swore I’d never let myself get caught in one of these god-forsaken paradoxes. The future is the past, the past is the future. It all gives me a headache.”

2. Seatbelts. Why don’t they have seatbelts? And why are some stations on the bridge chair-less? These people are so high tech, but when they encounter a bit of turbulence and stuff, the best they can do is yell “Hang on!”

3. Security cameras. Where are they? Again, they’re so high tech and they don’t have security cameras in the corridors or the turbolift (elevators). Many crimes could’ve been easily solved if there were security cameras.

4. The Prime Directive. Non-interference with the affairs of other cultures, especially pre-warp ones. This is a joke because They. Interfere. All. The. Time. Just by being around, they often interfere.

5. The universal translator. Some of the words they say cannot be literally translated. And why are their lips moving as if they’re all speaking English? If the device were real, talking to another species should be like watching a badly dubbed Mexican soap opera.

Yes, I realize that this is so geeky.








    Didn't find what you were looking for? Search again:



    22 Users Commented In " 5 Things I never understood about Star Trek "

    Subscribes to this post Comment RSS or TrackBack URL
    Peter says,
    3-28-2008 at 07:34:59     

    They dont need cameras. The ships computer can find anyone at request.
    What I want to know is why they have humans aiming the wepons and shit. Surely a super computer could do better than Warf.
    And is there really a universal translator (I watch in passing)? Seems that there are a lot of people in the univserse that they dont understad.

      scout says,
      3-28-2008 at 08:02:35     

      Voyager’s weapons system has automatic targeting capability (not sure about the older Star Trek ships). But yeah, the handheld weapons should have a sort of targeting sensor, specially at mid to long range.

      “They dont need cameras. The ships computer can find anyone at request.”

      Yes, they do. The computer tries to find people by locating their combadge. If someone left their combadge somewhere, it will be a bit difficult to trace them. Also, there was one episode (Repression - 7×04) wherein a murder was committed in the holodeck, and they initially had a hard time finding out who did it. If a security camera or any other visual recording device was present, the crime could have been solved in an instant, preventing others from getting hurt while they figure it out. Plus, you know, random monitoring. Tuvok, as security chief, would have found it useful and efficient.

      “And is there really a universal translator (I watch in passing)? Seems that there are a lot of people in the univserse that they dont understad.”

      The “universal translator” is part of their combadge in Voyager. It seems like a misnomer since it’s far from universal. There are some species with language too complex for it to understand, like Species 8472, the fairy-like beings in Equinox, and the species native to “The Void” whom they eventually communicated with thru musical notes.

      Wow. I actually *know* these things?

        Nevi says,
        3-28-2008 at 10:56:32     

        Of course they dont need seatbelts,because the spaceship is so advanced,that they dont have to think about petty stuff like nature laws.!lol!

          d3xownz says,
          3-28-2008 at 11:21:19     

          Since I am probably the biggest geek alive as well as a MAJOR Star Trek/Voyager fan, I feel the need to respond:

          1) Agreed.

          2)Two Words “Inertial Dampeners”; however since these are usually the first things targeted by any self respecting attacker, seat belts would help tremendously.

          3)There are security cameras on starships, but they only use them when they need something watched. It’s supposed to be an “enlightened era” and there are no need for such things.

          4) Agreed.

          5)I like your idea better.

            illuminatiscott says,
            3-28-2008 at 11:49:51     

            In regards to 4), the universal translator is, hypothetically, not a word-to-word translator like gtranslate or freetranslation.com. Rather, it is a computer system which, overseen by linguists, can translate idioms, analyze tone of voice to determine context, etc. It really is one of the most realistic pieces of Treknology - I actually think that a japanese company has developed a rudimentary portable voice translator device.

              illuminatiscott says,
              3-28-2008 at 11:50:10     

              oops, I meant 5

                Joel says,
                3-28-2008 at 12:04:59     

                OK, I don’t want to offend anybody, but I just want to point out that this is a Star Trek-related post written by a 20-something Asian lesbian. Life is good.

                  Fanboyz says,
                  3-28-2008 at 13:21:38     

                  Joel…

                  “…this is a Star Trek-related post written by a 20-something Asian lesbian. Life is good.”

                  Perhaps our host would like to comment about her feelings for 7 of 9?

                    Milos says,
                    3-28-2008 at 13:56:36     

                    Seems like Starfleet could use a 24th Century Ralph Nader.

                    “Unsafe at any Warp Factor”

                      Bluesphere says,
                      3-28-2008 at 14:23:58     

                      Oh come on ladies, how can you pay a tribute to the women Star Trek Voyager without mention of B’Lanna Torres. She is amazing, her strength, her courage, her sometimes snippiness. Her love hate relationship with 7 of 9. How can you not mention B’lanna??

                        celine says,
                        3-28-2008 at 14:33:07     

                        I love B’Elanna Torres. She’s my biggest Star Trek crush. I might just take you up on that idea and write an entire article about her. It’s a miracle that Scout wasn’t annoyed every time I was “rewriting” B’Elanna’s scenes with Seven to include a lesbian subtext.

                          Konijn says,
                          3-28-2008 at 16:21:34     

                          What always bothered me was the constant sparks and the fact that the bridge looked like a tornado went through it after a few phaser blasts. You would think they would have some sort of failsafe to prevent consoles from catching people on fire every time the ship was hit because it’s killed countless people throughout all series.

                            scout says,
                            3-28-2008 at 22:09:52     

                            Konijn: Good call. The Bridge and Engineering people really take a beating. Wish they’d solve that, or at least minimize it.

                              3-29-2008 at 20:31:11     

                              You forgot the most blaring bullshit. Whenever they find a new planet the captain or second in command takes the entire crew running the freakin ship dangerous or not down to the surface. I mean they would have strike teams, medical teams on stand by. I mean guys with alot of red shirts on. And what really gets me is how good man turns out. How money isn’t an issue anymore. I want to know how they got through our giant corporations or owners however you want to put it. Thats the star trek history I want to know.

                                Milander says,
                                3-30-2008 at 08:29:11     

                                What always does my head in is that whenever theyhave an away mission (all star trek series) for some reason they can only communicate by voice! Why on earth don’t they have mini-cams so that the bridge crew can actually watch what is happening?

                                Don’t even get me started on how the security/medic teams always seem to be strolling along to the emergency rather than running hell for leather or even beaming directly to the area… I could easily spend a few day punching holes in star trek but I still love it :-)

                                  Gepeto says,
                                  4-28-2008 at 12:12:37     

                                  Wow how informative. I never knew StarTrek was such a hotbed for hidden lesbian metaphors. Almost makes me wish i was one!

                                    scout says,
                                    4-28-2008 at 18:41:30     

                                    Gepeto: Actually, it’s not. Unless you have an active imagination.

                                    For all of Star Trek’s diversity, we have yet to see an openly gay character on the franchise. Or am I missing something?

                                      Dan says,
                                      12-4-2008 at 04:49:36     

                                      Check out my new site:)

                                        1-31-2009 at 04:35:11     

                                        It’s television.

                                        There should have be sensors and weapons in all of the corridors so the ship could defend itself from invasion. Shoot anything above a sertain size that isn’t a crew member. How many stories would that eliminate?

                                          Maggy says,
                                          2-24-2009 at 12:34:50     

                                          Greetings!..l

                                            Nick says,
                                            11-2-2009 at 10:05:10     

                                            You make some good points. The temporal anomalies are pretty bad. And with 24th Century technology Voyager really should have cameras with face recognition software. That way crew members couldn’t just throw away their combadge, go AWOL, and cause all kinds of mayhem. Anytime somebody wanted to go renegade they just took off their badge and nobody could find them.

                                            But I don’t think seatbelts would help very much at the speeds they’re travelling. Realistically, if they accelerated to lightspeed in less then a second by turning on their warp drive, they’d all be jelly anyway.

                                            “It’s a miracle that Scout wasn’t annoyed every time I was “rewriting” B’Elanna’s scenes with Seven to include a lesbian subtext.”

                                            Celine, I like the way you think.

                                            And no, there haven’t been any gay characters. But Dax did have an affair with a woman on DS9. And that relationship was destroyed by other people’s unfair expectations. So I think they made a pretty good point about how gay people deserve to be treated better.

                                              Trackback & Pingback

                                              Leave Your Reply Below

                                               Username

                                               Email Address

                                               Website

                                              Sticky note: Please double check your comments before submit Please Note: The comment moderation maybe active so there is no need to resubmit your comment
                                              feed_icon_final_320.gif

                                              THE BLURB

                                              About Womyn is a blog on lesbian culture. It's a journey and an exploration. We feature news, films, books, and even comics that depict us, whether as heroes or villains. If you're gay, or just simply open-minded, you're more than welcome to sit back, relax, and join the discussions.